Updated September 2026
Futures prop firms fund traders on real exchange-traded contracts (ES, NQ, crude, gold) with transparent, exchange-regulated pricing instead of broker spreads. Scored on pricing, rule fairness, payout reliability, support and platforms, the best right now are Topstep. The five scores behind each rating are published on the firm's page, so you can check ours. Commission size is not one of them.
Not scored yet
From $85 (50K account) · 90% split
A futures prop firm funds traders on exchange-listed futures contracts like the E-mini S&P 500 (ES), Nasdaq (NQ), crude oil, and gold. Because futures trade on centralized exchanges with public pricing, fills and data feeds are more transparent than CFD trading, and evaluations are usually measured in fixed dollar targets rather than percentages.
Futures firms typically run a single-phase evaluation with a fixed profit target and a trailing drawdown measured in dollars, and many bill the evaluation as a monthly subscription rather than a one-time fee. Contract limits scale as your balance grows, and most firms enforce consistency rules on daily profits.
A trailing drawdown moves up with your account high-water mark: if the limit is $2,500 and you make $1,000, your liquidation level rises by $1,000 too. Some firms trail on end-of-day balance (more forgiving) while others trail intraday on unrealized profit; each firm’s drawdown type is audited on its profile.
Most futures firms let you withdraw once you clear a safety buffer above the drawdown level, with profit splits of 80–100% and payout cycles from on-demand to bi-weekly. We aggregate dated community payout proofs into real payout-speed data on each firm’s profile instead of trusting advertised claims.
| Not scored yetTrustpilot 3.6 |
| Claim 10% off |
Scores combine verified trader reviews, Trustpilot trend tracking, rule fairness, and payout evidence; commissions never influence position. Read the full methodology.